i was trying to explain the mexico-malawi thing to someone without saying any direct accusations like "they're just after the real estate" or "they needed some big-publicity persecution"(because that would just shut the door on that convo.) but i told all the basic facts, about not being registered as a religion in mexico and all that. .....here's some of the response i got:
about mexico:
"that shows the faithfulness of these brothers to still be going to the meetings even without song, prayer and bibles! no other religion would do that!"
"of course we don't want the k-halls to be owned by the government... we're no part of the world."
and about malawi:
"they can't just make buying the party card a consciounce matter, it's based on the bible, its not something they can just decide."
i really want to help this person understand this........ but how?
A0